|
n
Articles and Rulings |
|
Legal News:
Israeli Court Orders Attachment of Palestinian Authority Funds Held
by Israel, in a Claim by a Terror Victim against the Palestinian Autonomy
for Damages
The Tel Aviv District Court has for the first time ordered the temporary
attachment of the funds of the Palestinian Authority in the amount of
four million shekels, held by Israel’s Ministry of Finance, in a claim
brought against the Palestinian Authority by a victim of the terrorist
bombing at the Dizengoff Centre shopping mall in Tel Aviv in March 1996.
The victim, 29 years old at the time of the terrorist bombing, has been
immobilized and confined to a wheelchair ever since.
The judge Judith Schitzer ruled that the plaintiff had shown a prima
facie right of action against the Palestinian Authority, and that there
were reasonable grounds to fear that absent an attachment order, the plaintiff’s
ability to collect a damages award in his favour would be prejudiced.
The judge further ruled that the only assets belonging to the Palestinian
Authority, from which the victim is able to collect damages (if awarded),
were the funds held by the State of Israel on behalf of the Palestinian
Authority. If the State of Israel were for any reason to release
the funds which are currently “frozen”, the plaintiff would have no other
source for the collection of the damages award.
In the motion for the attachment the plaintiff’s counsel argued that
international practice has shown that an armistice or a peace agreement
is likely to include terms barring civil claims against the former enemy;
therefore, an agreement with the Palestinian Authority, when reached,
would be liable to preclude the damages claims of Israeli victims of Palestinian
terror; further an agreement might change the current financial arrangement
under which the funds of the Palestinian Authority resulting from the
collected value added tax are channelled through Israel’s Ministry of Finance.
Civil case 704/97 Dan Shlomi et al v. the Palestinian Authority et
al. (February 13, 2002)
|
|
Return to home page
Go
to Practice Areas
Go to
Articles and Rulings
Important disclaimer |