|
n
Articles and Rulings
Press report on Zell Goldberg's petition [LINK]
Petition (in Hebrew)
[PDF]
Written Opinion of Prof. H. Gvirtzman (in Hebrew)
[PDF]
Outfall
Assessment Document of Prof. Brenner (in English)
[PDF]
Court order
September 11th, 2005 (in Hebrew)
[PDF]
The Government's Filing in Response to
the Petition: Pages
1,
2,
3
and
4
[PDF]
Interim High Court of
Justice Ruling 28th September 2005 [PDF] |
|
Zell Goldberg Petitions High Court of
Justice On Environmental
Issues
September 11, 2005: Zell,
Goldberg today filed a High Court of Justice Petition seeking a Show
Cause order in connection with the government's failure to comply with
international environmental law as well with as international and
regional marine pollution agreements in connection with the
implementation of the Government's unilateral disengagement plan from
the Gaza District.
Hours before the government of
Israel was to hand over control of the Gaza District to the
Palestinians, Zell, Goldberg acting on behalf of three university
professors petitioned the High Court of Justice for an order requiring
the government to show cause why it had failed to take ecological and
environmental impacts into account in fashioning the disengagement plan.
The petition was supported by
expert opinions by one of Israel's leading environmental experts,
Professor Haim Gvirtzman of Hebrew University and Professor Steve
Brenner, the country's foremost expert on Mediterranean ocean currents.
The expert opinions raised
serious concerns that, upon Israel's departure from the Gaza District,
it will lose the ability to control the disposition of millions of tons
of raw sewage generated by the municipalities of Gaza City, Khan Yunis
and Rafah, which could be released into the Mediterranean whence it
would be carried to Israeli coastal waters off Ashkelon, Ashdod and even
Tel Aviv_Jaffa, thereby threatening the health of thousands of residents
in those congested areas.
While the High Court did not
agree to issue an immediate show cause order because of the imminent
departure of Israeli forces from Gaza, it did order the State to file a
response within 15 days.
This case marks the first time
the courts have been asked to review the disengagement program from an
environmental perspective.
|
|
Return to home page
Go
to Practice Areas
Go to
Articles and Rulings
Important disclaimer |